NCERT Solutions Class 10 for Social Science Civics Chapter 1 Power-Sharing

NCERT Solutions Class 10 for Social Science Civis Chapter 1 Power-Sharing : In this post, we will share with you all the detailed NCERT Solutions of Class 10 Social Science Civics Chapter 1 Power-Sharing. This will contain both in-text and back-exercise questions for Science and Social Science, and all exercise questions for Mathematics. For all school and board level examinations, doing all the NCERT Questions is a must.

Why are NCERT Questions Important?

NCERT Questions and Answers not only help you get hold of concepts firmly and enhance your understanding, but also form the base of all types of questions asked in exams. Questions asked in exam are more or less the same type as mentioned in NCERT. Moreover, sometimes the questions in NCERT are directly asked in exams, as it is, without any changes.

Hence, it’s very important to understand NCERT Questions and Answers.

[adinserter block=”3″]

Class 10 Social Science Civics Chapter 1 – Power-Sharing

[twy_show_add_bookmark]

Exercise Questions (Page 10)

Question 1:
What are the different forms of power-sharing in modern democracies? Give an example of each of these.

Answer 1:
There are different forms of power-sharing in modern democracies. These are given below:

a.Horizontal distribution of power – Power is shared among different organs of government, such as the legislature, executive and judiciary. Example – India
b.The federal division of power – Power can be shared among governments at different levels – a general government for the entire country and governments at the provincial or regional level. Example – India (Union Government & State Government)
c.Community government – Power may also be shared among different social groups such as the religious and linguistic groups. Example – Belgium
d.Power-sharing between political parties, pressure groups and movements – Such competition ensures that power does not remain in one hand. In the long run, power is shared among different political parties that represent different ideologies and social groups.

Question 2:
State one prudential reason and one moral reason for power-sharing with an example from the Indian context.

Answer 2:
While prudential reasons stress that power-sharing will bring out better outcomes. In India, the power is shared horizontally among various organs of government. The Legislature, Executive and Judiciary are responsible for administering India. Reservation is applicable in India, where various sections are given benefits over others to avoid conflicts.
Moral reasons emphasise the very act of power-sharing as valuable. In India, citizens are conferred with fundamental rights and directive principles of state policies are implied on the government.

Question 3:
After reading this chapter, three students drew different conclusions. Which of these do you agree with and why? Give your reasons in about 50 words. Thomman – Power sharing is necessary only in societies which have religious, linguistic or ethnic divisions. Mathayi – Power sharing is suitable only for big countries that have regional divisions. Ouseph – Every society needs some form of power sharing even if it is small or does not have social divisions.

Answer 3:
Ouseph’s conclusion is the right one. Every state should have some or the other form of power-sharing. Power-sharing ensures an optimum balance between different sections in the society. The chances of conflict lessen, and so does the injustice. Hence, power-sharing becomes the value of democracy. Also, power-sharing is a good way to ensure the stability of political order.

[adinserter block=”3″]

Question 4:
The Mayor of Merchtem, a town near Brussels in Belgium, has defended a ban on speaking French in the town’s schools. He said that the ban would help all non-Dutch speakers integrate into this Flemish town. Do you think that this measure is in keeping with the spirit of Belgium’s power-sharing arrangements? Give your reasons in about 50 words.

Answer 4:
The measure of Mayor of Merchtem to ban on French-speaking in the town’s schools near Brussels is unfair. It does not keep with Belgium’s power-sharing arrangement. Power-sharing helps maintain a balance between different sections of society, and in Belgium, there is a need to maintain the power-sharing between Dutch and French to avoid civil unrest. Banning French will promote the tendency of civil unrest. To promote peace among different communities, the Mayor should promote bilingual education system in the town’s schools.

Question 5:
Read the following passage and pick out any one of the prudential reasons for power sharing offered in this. “We need to give more power to the panchayats to realise the dream of Mahatma Gandhi and the hopes of the makers of our Constitution. Panchayati Raj establishes true democracy. It restores power to the only place where power belongs in a democracy – in the hands of the people. Giving power to Panchayats is also a way to reduce corruption and increase administrative efficiency. When people participate in the planning and implementation of developmental schemes, they would naturally exercise greater control over these schemes. This would eliminate the corrupt middlemen. Thus, Panchayati Raj will strengthen the foundations of our democracy.”

Answer 5:
The following prudential reasons are cited into the passage for power sharing.
(a) Reducing corruption by giving power into the hands of the people and thus, making them responsible for their own decisions.
(b) Increasing administrative efficiency by delegating the decision-making function to the people affected by it.
(c) Improving the efficiency of the system by reducing the number of middlemen, and transferring the planning and implementation to the people concerned through the Panchayats.

Question 6:
Different arguments are usually put forth in favour of and against power-sharing. Identify those which are in favour of power-sharing and select the answer using the codes given below? Power-sharing:

A.reduces conflict among different communities
B.decreases the possibility of arbitrariness
C.delays the decision-making process
D.accommodates diversities
E.increases instability and divisiveness
F.promotes people’s participation in government
G. undermines the unity of a country

Answer 6:
(a) A B D F

[adinserter block=”3″]

Question 7:
Consider the following statements about power-sharing arrangements in Belgium and Sri Lanka.

A.In Belgium, the Dutch-speaking majority people tried to impose their domination on the minority French-speaking community.
B.In Sri Lanka, the policies of the government sought to ensure the dominance of the Sinhala-speaking majority.
C.The Tamils in Sri Lanka demanded a federal arrangement of power-sharing to protect their culture, language and equality of opportunity in education and jobs.
D.The transformation of Belgium from unitary government to a federal one prevented a possible division of the country on linguistic lines

Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) A, B, C and D
(b) A, B and D
(c) C and D
(d) B, C and D

Answer 7:
(d) B, C and D

Question 8:
Match List I (forms of power-sharing) with List-II (forms of government) and select the correct answer using the codes given below in the lists: